RAC Acceptance East v. McBurnie
Supreme Court of the United States
- Home
- Retail Litigation Center
- RAC Acceptance East v. McBurnie
Case: RAC Acceptance East v. McBurnie
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Date: July 15, 2024
Question Presented: “Whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits courts to refuse to sever and compel arbitration of individualized and divisible components of a claim merely because they have been pleaded as a single cause of action with a nonarbitrable request, such as for a public injunction, and the arbitration agreement expressly provides that a ‘claim for relief’ that cannot be arbitration individually is severable and remains n court.”
RLC’s Position: The RLC's brief explains the importance of the question presented, articulates the conflict of the Ninth Circuit’s decision with FAA jurisprudence, and specifies that this case is a good vehicle for clarifying any confusing leading to decisions inconsistent with the FAA after Viking River.
Coalition: The RLC joined a coalition brief led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Counsel: Peter B. Rutledge
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights
CHEVRON OVERRULED: ENDING THE “DIZZYING BREAKDANCE”
- By [Larissa Whittingham]
- 07/01/2024
SCOTUS Upholds Public Safety Laws That Help Communities
- By [Deborah White]
- 06/28/2024
1st Amendment Requires Overturning NLRB Uniform Decision
- By [Deborah White]
- 05/30/2024
RLC Board Directors & Guest RLC CLOs Sworn into SCOTUS Bar
- 04/17/2024
Retailers Ask SCOTUS: Overturn Harmful 9th Circuit Decision
- By [Deborah White]
- 03/05/2024
Multi-Year PAGA Trials: What’s a Court to Do?
- By [Larissa Whittingham]
- 12/15/2023